By Joseph Admin Opio
The president of Okadibong
The recent controversy surrounding the Ateker Cup of Nations raises a bigger question about the relationship between the Iteso Cultural Union (ICU) and grassroots initiatives. From disputes involving Okadibong to the current Ateker Cup controversy, there appears to be a growing pattern of confrontation instead of engagement.
From Okadibong to Ateker Cup
Okadibong is one example where cultural and community initiatives have faced disagreements and resistance. Now, the Ateker Cup of Nations, a youth-driven initiative aimed at bringing Ateker communities together through sport and culture, is also facing public disagreement with ICU.
The question is whether cultural institutions should primarily fight initiatives emerging from their communities or find ways to guide, support and coordinate them.
ICU has every right to protect its name, identity and institutional interests. However, disagreements should not automatically become battles. Dialogue, mediation and engagement can resolve many disputes before they escalate.
Support the Children
Young people need cultural institutions that listen to them, mentor them and help transform their ideas into sustainable programmes. The Ateker Cup could be an opportunity for unity rather than division.
ICU should reconsider its approach. Instead of fighting its own children, it should bring them to the table, listen to their concerns and build partnerships that strengthen the Iteso community.
Copyright ©Teso Vibez is a brand of Teso Vibez Digital (u) Ltd
.